← All Tools

REVEL

VERIFIED

## Connections

variant-classification pathogenicity ensemble

What It Does

  • Ensemble score from 13 tools: MutPred, FATHMM, VEST, PolyPhen, SIFT, PROVEAN, MutationAssessor, MutationTaster, LRT, GERP, SiPhy, phyloP, phastCons
  • Score 0-1: higher = more likely pathogenic
  • Calibrated for rare variants (MAF <0.5%)
  • Thresholds per Pejaver 2022: ≥0.773 = PP3_Moderate, ≥0.932 = PP3_Strong

How to Use

### Web

  • https://sites.google.com/site/revelgenomics/
  • Download pre-computed scores (by chromosome)

### Via dbNSFP (Recommended)


        # Download dbNSFP (includes REVEL + 30 other predictors)
        # Then query:
        tabix dbNSFP4.5a_variant.chr15.gz 43600551-43600551
        

### Via Ensembl VEP


        # VEP includes REVEL plugin
        vep --input_file variants.vcf --plugin REVEL,revel_scores.tsv.gz
        

### Via VarSome / Franklin

Both web tools show REVEL score on their variant pages.

Verified Status

VERIFIED — STRC E1659A REVEL score: 0.789. Exceeds PP3_Moderate threshold (≥0.773) per Pejaver 2022 calibration. This was a critical correction — previous analysis incorrectly cited 0.65.

STRC Research Usage

  • STRC E1659A Conservation and Reclassification — PP3 evidence (0.789 ≥ 0.773 = Moderate)
  • STRC Variant c.4976A>C — Misha — ACMG classification
  • Confirmed: score below PP3_Strong threshold (0.932), so only Moderate

Critical Notes

  • REVEL 0.789 ≠ PP3_Strong — only reaches Moderate per Pejaver 2022
  • Complements AlphaMissense — different methodology, similar conclusion
  • Pejaver 2022 thresholds are ClinGen-recommended — use these, not arbitrary cutoffs

Critical Notes

  • REVEL 0.789 ≠ PP3_Strong — only reaches Moderate per Pejaver 2022
  • Complements AlphaMissense — different methodology, similar conclusion
  • Pejaver 2022 thresholds are ClinGen-recommended — use these, not arbitrary cutoffs