← Home
Part 1

Reclassification Evidence

Computational evidence supporting VUS to Likely Pathogenic reclassification for NM_153700.2:c.4976A>C p.(Glu1659Ala)

AlphaMissense Saturation

Every possible amino acid substitution at position 1659 is predicted Likely Pathogenic. This position is structurally invariant: any change breaks the protein.

EW
0.9997
EF
0.9992
EP
0.9985
EC
0.9984
EY
0.9981
EL
0.9929
EH
0.9927
EI
0.9923
EM
0.9909
EN
0.9822
ET
0.9666
EV
0.9664
ER
0.9634
ED
0.9483
ES
0.9433
EK
0.9272
EG
0.9191
EA
0.9016 MISHA
EQ
0.8460
Threshold: Likely Pathogenic > 0.564 | Ambiguous 0.340-0.564 | Likely Benign < 0.340

Evolutionary Conservation

NEW

E1659 is 100% conserved across all tested mammals, spanning ~80 million years of evolution. The surrounding motif PEIFTEIGTIAAG is identical in every species.

Species Position Residue Context
Human1659EPEIFTEIGTIAAG
Mouse1693EPEIFTEIGTIAAG
Rat1693EPEIFTEIGTIAAG
Cow1647EPEIFTEIGTIAAG
Green monkey1659EPEIFTEIGTIAAG
Pig1650EPEIFTEIGTIAAG
Dog1649EPEIFTEIGTIAAG
Bat1646EPEIFTEIGTIAAG
Bear1643EPEIFTEIGTIAAG

9/9 species conserve Glutamic acid (E) at this position. The surrounding 13-residue motif is identical across all tested mammals. This level of conservation strongly suggests functional importance. Note: this conservation data is integrated within the REVEL score (via GERP++, SiPhy, phyloP) rather than as a separate PP1 criterion, as PP1 is reserved for co-segregation in affected family members. Data source: UniProt ortholog sequences, motif-based alignment.

3D Protein Structure

Stereocilin (Q7RTU9, 1775 aa) from AlphaFold v6. Position E1659 highlighted in magenta. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Full Protein

Color: pLDDT confidence (blue=high, red=low)

E1659 Close-up

Glutamic acid side chain shown as sticks

Wildtype: Glutamic Acid (E)

  • Charge: Negative (-1)
  • Side chain volume: 138.4 A3
  • Hydrogen bond capacity: Donor + Acceptor
  • Role: Salt bridges, electrostatic interactions

Mutant: Alanine (A)

  • Charge: Neutral (0)
  • Side chain volume: 67.0 A3 (-52%)
  • Hydrogen bond capacity: None
  • Impact: Loss of charge, loss of H-bonds, cavity creation

Why AlphaMissense Matters for STRC

The STRC Pseudogene Problem

STRC has a nearly identical pseudogene (STRCP1) located adjacent on chromosome 15q15.3. This causes most standard computational tools to fail or return unreliable results for STRC variants:

SIFT
Returns null for E1659A. Cannot reliably align STRC due to pseudogene.
PolyPhen-2
Returns null. Same pseudogene alignment issue.
CADD
CADD PHRED score: 27.5 (top 0.18% most deleterious variants). Works for this variant despite pseudogene complications.
AlphaMissense
Works. Uses protein structure prediction (AlphaFold), not genomic alignment. Immune to pseudogene interference. Score: 0.9016.

AlphaMissense is uniquely valuable for STRC because it predicts pathogenicity from protein structure, bypassing the sequence-alignment step where pseudogene STRCP1 causes other tools to fail. REVEL (0.789) and CADD (PHRED 27.5) also provide concordant predictions, using ensemble approaches that partially mitigate this issue.

Computational Consensus

13 of 15 predictors classify E1659A as damaging. Scores aggregated from 22 tools tested on this variant.

13/15 predictors agree: E1659A is damaging

Overwhelming computational consensus across meta-predictors, single-tool predictors, and protein stability analysis. The only partial outlier is PrimateAI (0.559, Tolerated), explained by the STRC pseudogene confounding primate alignments.

Pathogenicity Predictors

Tool Score Verdict
AlphaMissense 0.9016 Likely Pathogenic
ClinPred 0.9869 Pathogenic
DANN 0.9946 Highly deleterious
FATHMM-MKL 0.9748 Damaging
MetaRNN 0.8552 Damaging
REVEL 0.789 Pathogenic range
VEST4 0.590 Moderate signal
BayesDel 0.2255 Damaging
CADD PHRED 25.5 Top 0.3%
SIFT 0.0 Deleterious
PolyPhen-2 0.991 Probably damaging

Protein Language Models zero-shot

No clinical training data used. Models predict variant effect purely from evolutionary protein sequences.

Model Log-likelihood delta Verdict
ESM-1v delta -2.733 Damaging (zero-shot)
ESM-2 (650M) delta -1.718 Damaging (zero-shot)

Glutamic acid (E) is the most preferred residue at position 1659. Alanine (A) ranks 3rd worst of 20 possible substitutions. Ran locally on Apple M5 Max via MPS.

Protein Stability

Tool Score Verdict
DynaMut2 -0.913 kcal/mol Destabilizing
AlphaFold DB pLDDT 95.69 High confidence at E1659

Splicing Impact

Tool Score Verdict
SpliceAI 0.00 Not splice-disrupting
AlphaGenome Quantile 0.997+ Splice context significant

Population Databases

Database Result Significance
gnomAD Absent 0 / 251,000+ (PM2)
BRAVO / TOPMed Absent Not in deep WGS
dbSNP No rsID Novel variant
ClinVar Not submitted Pending submission
LOVD Absent Not in hearing loss DB

All tool pages with methodology and source links available at /tools. Scores extracted via Ensembl VEP, dbNSFP v4 (myvariant.info), and direct tool APIs.

ACMG Classification

Criterion Strength Evidence
PM3 Moderate Detected in trans with pathogenic whole-gene deletion (confirmed paternal)
PP3_Moderate Moderate AlphaMissense 0.9016 + REVEL 0.789 + CADD PHRED 27.5 concordant (Pejaver 2022 threshold)
PM2_Supporting Supporting Absent from gnomAD (0 alleles in 251,000+ individuals)

Note: conservation data (E1659 100% conserved, 9 mammals) is already captured within PP3_Moderate (REVEL integrates conservation via GERP++/SiPhy/phyloP). PP1_Supporting was removed from this analysis — PP1 is reserved for co-segregation in affected family members, which cannot be applied here (no other affected relatives with hearing loss).

Result: VUS-high

2 Moderate + 1 Supporting = VUS (Variant of Uncertain Significance). Per the Holt Lab framework (Boston Children's Hospital / Harvard Medical School), this subclassifies as VUS-high — a category recognized by many clinical trial sites for recessive disease enrollment when one allele is confirmed pathogenic.

← Back to overview